Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): The QUEST: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development
Articles

Development and Evaluation of a Rechargeable 12V A3 Technical Drafting Board

Billie Jack Pasion
Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology
MArites Cumbe
Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology
Ofelia Bawan
Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology
Maria Isidra Marcos
Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology
Eminiano Manuzon
Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology
John Christopher Fajardo
Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology
v2i2

Published 12/30/2023

Keywords

  • 12 Volts,
  • A3 Size,
  • Functionality,
  • Maintainability,
  • Technical Drafting Board

How to Cite

Pasion, B. J., Cumbe, M., Bawan, O., Marcos, M. I., Manuzon, E., & Fajardo, J. C. (2023). Development and Evaluation of a Rechargeable 12V A3 Technical Drafting Board. The QUEST: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.60008/thequest.v2i2.101

Abstract

This This research aimed to develop and evaluate the 12V A3 Technical Drafting Board, with a primary focus on its applicability in technical drafting courses in the Philippines. Technical drafting education in the country emphasizes the acquisition of skills and knowledge necessary for generating precise drawings through the utilization of specialized tools and software. Employing a developmental research design within the IPO model framework, this study delineated a systematic roadmap for the various stages involved in the creation of the 12V A3 Technical Drafting Board. Feedback from the two groups of respondents attests to the effectiveness of the 12V A3 Technical Drafting Board in fulfilling its intended purpose. Expert evaluations highlight its high functionality, particularly praising its rechargeable feature and adjustable angles. Notably, the board's maintainability garnered positive remarks, emphasizing the ease of replacing electrical components readily available in the market. Evaluation results from both teachers and students collectively indicate overall satisfaction with the board's instructional utility.

Full PDF

References

  1. Bass, L., Clements, P., & Kazman, R. (2012). Software Architecture in Practice (3rd ed.). Addison-Wesley.
  2. Boardman, A., Greenberg, D. H., Vining, A. R., & Weimer, D. L. (2018). Cost-Benefit Analysis: Concepts and Practice (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  3. Cooper, R. G. (2019). New Product Development: A Step-by-Step Approach to Developing Your Next New Product or Service. Basic Books.
  4. Harrin, E. (n.d.). The Complete Guide to Gantt Charts for Project Management. ProjectManager.com.
  5. Hart, S., & Fiegener, J. R. (2018). New Product Development: Managing and Forecasting for Strategic Success. Wiley.
  6. ISO 12616-1:2021. (n.d.). ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/72308.html
  7. Schilling, M. A. (2017). Strategic Management of Technological Innovation (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
  8. Schilling, M. A., & Hill, C. W. (1998). Managing the New Product Development Process: Strategic Imperatives. The Academy of Management Executive, 12(3), 67-81.
  9. Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. (2015). Product Design and Development. McGraw-Hill Education.