Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): The QUEST: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development (Articles in Press)
Articles

Assessment of the Transportation and Mobility Impacts of Santa Rosa Bridge Rehabilitation on Student Commuters

  • John Vincent Santos,
  • Noel Florencondia
John Vincent Santos
Holy Cross College, Sta. Rosa, N.E., Inc.
Noel Florencondia
Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology
DOI: https://doi.org/10.60008/thequest.v3i2.207

Published 09/28/2024

Keywords

  • InfInfrastructure Rehabilitation,
  • Mobility Disruption,
  • Student Commuters,
  • Transportation Impact,
  • Transportation Policy

How to Cite

Santos, J. V., & Florencondia, N. (2024). Assessment of the Transportation and Mobility Impacts of Santa Rosa Bridge Rehabilitation on Student Commuters. The QUEST: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.60008/thequest.v3i2.207

Copyright (c) 2024 The QUEST: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Abstract

This study assessed the transportation and mobility impacts of the Santa Rosa Bridge rehabilitation on student commuters, focusing on how this infrastructure project affects their daily travel experiences. The study employs a descriptive-comparative methodology, gathering data from 117 student commuters through a researcher-made questionnaire distributed online. Results reveal a significant increase in travel time, with more students experiencing delays of 1-2 hours or more. Additionally, the rehabilitation has led to decreased satisfaction with available transportation options and overall commuting experiences, as evidenced by a decline in weighted mean scores across all transportation and mobility constructs. The study concludes that the rehabilitation project has adversely affected student commuters, disrupting their routines and reducing the reliability of their commutes. These findings highlights the need for proactive measures, such as alternative transportation options or temporary shuttle services, to mitigate the impact on student mobility during infrastructure projects.

Full Paper

References

  1. Agaton, C. B., Collera, A. A., & Guno, C. S. (2020). Socio-economic and environmental analyses of sustainable public transport in the Philippines. Sustainability, 12(11), 4720.
  2. Ali, M. (2023). Data Protection, Confidentiality and Anonymity. In Information Systems Research: Foundations, Design and Theory (pp. 189-198). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  3. Allirani, H., & Verma, A. (2022). Quality of life (QoL) effects of sustainable transport policy framework in developing economies. Transportation in developing economies, 8, 1-13.
  4. Bergstad, C. J., Gamble, A., Gärling, T., Hagman, O., Polk, M., Ettema, D., ... & Olsson, L. E. (2011). Subjective well-being related to satisfaction with daily travel. Transportation, 38, 1-15.
  5. Cleophas, T. J., Zwinderman, A. H., Cleophas, T. J., & Zwinderman, A. H. (2016). Paired continuous data (Paired T-test, Wilcoxon signed rank test). Clinical data analysis on a pocket calculator: understanding the scientific methods of statistical reasoning and hypothesis testing, 31-36.
  6. Crawford, K. C. (2023). Perspective Chapter: Bridge Deterioration and Failures. In Failure Analysis-Structural Health Monitoring of Structure and Infrastructure Components. IntechOpen.
  7. D’Auria, A., Cennamo, G. M., & Di Ruocco, I. (2022). Environmental Impact of Transportation Infrastructures: Integrated Methodologies for Preliminary Assessment. A Case-Study. In Urban Regeneration Through Valuation Systems for Innovation (pp. 119-139). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  8. De Mesa, R. Y. H., Marfori, J. R. A., Fabian, N. M. C., Camiling-Alfonso, R., Javelosa, M. A. U., Bernal-Sundiang, N., ... & Dans, A. M. L. (2023). Experiences from the Philippine grassroots: impact of strengthening primary care systems on health worker satisfaction and intention to stay. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1), 117.
  9. Dong, B. X., Shan, M., & Hwang, B. G. (2022). Simulation of transportation infrastructures resilience: a comprehensive review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(9), 12965-12983.
  10. Fernando, K. E. T., & Henry, M. (2023, March). Road Development Risks and Challenges in the Philippines. In Proceedings of The 17th East Asian-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction, 2022: EASEC-17, Singapore (pp. 326-339). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
  11. Flores-Albornoz, J., Nirmala, M. M., Mukthar, K. J., Asnate-Salazar, E., Ramirez, E. H., & Raju, V. (2023). Unlocking Solution for Urban Transportation Woes: Addressing the Challenges of Modern City Living. In AI and Business, and Innovation Research: Understanding the Potential and Risks of AI for Modern Enterprises (pp. 3-10). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
  12. Friman, M., Lättman, K., & Olsson, L. E. (2020). Public transport quality, safety, and perceived accessibility. Sustainability, 12(9), 3563.
  13. Guno, C. S., Collera, A. A., & Agaton, C. B. (2021). Barriers and drivers of transition to sustainable public transport in the Philippines. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 12(1), 46.
  14. He, F. (2019). Undergraduate Commuter Students: Challenges and Struggles. Journal of Student Affairs, New York University, 15, 43-49.
  15. Jamei, E., Chan, M., Chau, H. W., Gaisie, E., & Lättman, K. (2022). Perceived accessibility and key influencing factors in transportation. Sustainability, 14(17), 10806.
  16. Jamil, M. A., & Khanam, S. (2023). Influence of One-Way ANOVA and Kruskal–Wallis Based Feature Ranking on the Performance of ML Classifiers for Bearing Fault Diagnosis. Journal of Vibration Engineering & Technologies, 1-32.
  17. Kang, H. (2021). Sample size determination and power analysis using the G* Power software. Journal of educational evaluation for health professions, 18.
  18. Karimi, H., Ghadirifaraz, B., Shetab Boushehri, S. N., Hosseininasab, S. M., & Rafiei, N. (2021). Reducing traffic congestion and increasing sustainability in special urban areas through one-way traffic reconfiguration. Transportation, 1-24.
  19. Miksza, P., Shaw, J. T., Kapalka Richerme, L., Hash, P. M., Hodges, D. A., & Cassidy Parker, E. (2023). Quantitative Descriptive and Correlational Research. Music Education Research: An Introduction.
  20. Minelgaitė, A., Dagiliūtė, R., & Liobikienė, G. (2020). The usage of public transport and impact of satisfaction in the European Union. Sustainability, 12(21), 9154.
  21. Monteiro, M. M., de Abreu e Silva, J., Ingvardson, J. B., Nielsen, O. A., & Pinho de Sousa, J. (2021). Public transport use and satisfaction by international students and researchers. Sustainability, 13(15), 8417.
  22. Moyano, A., Stępniak, M., Moya-Gómez, B., & García-Palomares, J. C. (2021). Traffic congestion and economic context: changes of spatiotemporal patterns of traffic travel times during crisis and post-crisis periods. Transportation, 48(6), 3301-3324.
  23. Navarro, A. M., & Latigar, J. S. (2022). Road and Rail Transport Infrastructure in the Philippines: Current State, Issues, and Challenges (No. 2022-34). PIDS Discussion Paper Series.
  24. Page, N., Forster-Wilkins, G., & Bonetzky, M. (2021). The Impact of Student Timetables and Commuting on Student Satisfaction. New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences, 16(1), n1.
  25. Rebers, S., Aaronson, N. K., van Leeuwen, F. E., & Schmidt, M. K. (2016). Exceptions to the rule of informed consent for research with an intervention. BMC medical Ethics, 17, 1-11.
  26. Rivera, J. P. M. (2017). Road Safety Management of the Department of Public Works and Highways: Basis for Policy Recommendation. SPUP Graduate School Research Journal, 15(1).
  27. Sivasubramaniam, S., Dlabolová, D. H., Kralikova, V., & Khan, Z. R. (2021). Assisting you to advance with ethics in research: an introduction to ethical governance and application procedures. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17, 1-18.
  28. Tigre, R., Sampaio, B., & Menezes, T. (2017). The impact of commuting time on youth's school performance. Journal of Regional Science, 57(1), 28-47.
  29. Trček, B., & Mesarec, B. (2022). Pathways to Alternative Transport Mode Choices among University Students and Staff—Commuting to the University of Maribor since 2010. Sustainability, 14(18), 11336.
  30. Wagner, M., Shirgaokar, M., & Marshall, W. (2024). Understanding Everyday Travel Experiences and Transportation Infrastructure Challenges of People with Disabilities in Denver, CO. Transportation Research Record, 03611981231174400.
  31. Whalen, K. E., Páez, A., & Carrasco, J. A. (2013). Mode choice of university students commuting to school and the role of active travel. Journal of Transport Geography, 31, 132-142.
  32. Wiese, C. W., Li, Y., Tang, Y., & Brown, T. I. (2023). The Unique Impact of Commuting Time, Quality, and Predictability on Worker Well-Being and Performance. Occupational Health Science, 1-33.
  33. Woldeamanuel, M. G., & Cyganski, R. (2011, October). Factors affecting traveller’s satisfaction with accessibility to public transportation. In European Transport Conference, Glasgow.
  34. Zhang, X., Li, Q., & Wang, Y. (2023). Impact of Commuting Time on Employees’ Job Satisfaction—An Empirical Study Based on China’s Family Panel Studies (CFPS). Sustainability, 15(19), 14102.